It's my pleasure to welcome Sage here today, to talk about the books!
(I'm in bold)
In
the first Jinx book, I felt a strong Diana Wynne Jones vibe. In this third one,
I was feeling Terry Pratchett--the use of fantasy to address larger issue of
relevance (in this case, Nation building and the rights of indigenous people to
their environments). Are you in fact a
Pratchett fan, and was this something that occurred to you as you were writing
Jinx's Fire?
Aw,
thanks! I’m a huge Terry
Pratchett fan, and of course a huge DWJ fan. I’ve reread both of their bodies of work
dozens of times.
I
actually always thought I was Pratchetting a bit, but nobody mentioned it until
Jinx’s Fire. I’m not sure what’s different about
Jinx’s Fire. (for me it's the a strong element of getting along with non-human folk and recognizing them as fellow Urwalders ....)
But
from the beginning, I thought of the Jinx trilogy as an American fantasy,
loosely based on our own origin myths.
I’m sure you know
that the 13 colonies didn’t like or identify
with each other very much to start out with, pretty much like the clearings in
the Urwald. We only united because we had to. Join or die, as Ben Franklin
said.
And
what are we if not an amalgam of different people who are constantly having to
learn not to see each other as monsters?
And
now I am wondering if there is some other author reverberating in Jinx's
Magic....
Not
that I’m aware of! I’m trying to think
who I’ve reread as many
times as those two. J.K. Rowling, I guess, and on the American side, Anya Seton
(historical fiction) and of course Walt Kelly’s Pogo books. I read the Oz books a
lot before I was nine, but not since; still, I think there are echoes of them
here and there in the Jinx series.
And
Tintin. The Tintin opus was the entire universe of graphic novels when I was a
kid. It’s quite possible I
can recite it. (me--I don't see any obvious Tintin influences in Jinx...Captain Haddock as Simon is too much of a stretch, even though they are both grumpy from time to time....)
I
was very struck by your contemplation of
gender identity with regard to witches and wizards, and I wish there'd been a
bit more room to play with this more. I guess I don't really have a question
qua question about this, but was just wondering if you had more thoughts on the
matter of gender identity and magical power to share.
Well,
I decided that in the Urwald, the collective term for wizards and witches would
be the gender-neutral “magicians”.
And
it then naturally followed that not everyone who practiced magic was going to
find their calling within prescribed gender roles.
Witches’ magic focuses on
survival, while wizards’ magic is all about
power. Still, certain outcomes are the same: magicians are the only residents
of the Urwald who routinely achieve old age, they don’t starve, and for
the most part nobody messes with them.
Jinx’s first power, his
ability to see other people’s feelings,
actually came from my wondering whether intuition evolved out of the need to
protect ourselves from violence. Jinx has the intuition most humans have… and then just a
little bit more.
I
worried people would pick up on this and think Jinx wasn’t a “real” boy, but he seems
to have passed muster. I mostly hear from boys about the books, and by and
large they want to be Jinx.
Which
makes me happy because, for all his faults, Jinx is no sexist.
And
he’s neither a witch
nor a wizard but something else that he’s
created out of himself.
How
on earth did you manage to sneak "quondam" past your editor? or is your editor
an erudite person, who feels kindly to Latin?
All
editors are erudite people! I’ve had three
wonderfully brilliant editors for the Jinx series: the legendary Anne
Hoppe, who acquired Jinx and edited it (and who was also Terry Pratchett’s MG/YA editor);
Sarah Shumway Liu, who took over early in the editing process of Jinx’s Magic, and Katie Bignell,
who edited Jinx’s Fire. They are all
erudite to beat the band.
Thanks
for giving me a chance to mention their names. Of all the people that are
credited in the production of a book, editors are conspicuous by their absence.
And yet they do tons of work and are huge influences in shaping a novel.
There
was never any question raised about “quondam”, actually… and this was only
slightly to my surprise. I’ve only once had a
word flagged as too difficult by an editor (not one of the editors above) and
that word was “firkin”.
Which
of the three books was the most fun to write? which gave you the
most grief?
Well,
I suppose Jinx was in a way the most fun, because I was just writing to
please myself. My previous attempt at a MG fantasy hadn’t sold, so I
thought Jinx wouldn’t either, and
therefore I just put into it what I loved most— forests, cranky wizards, cackling witches, plucky orphans,
trolls.
Jinx’s Magic was the hardest.
Around the point where Jinx and company leave Witch Seymour’s house, my life
fell apart the way lives do. So unlike the 1st and 3rd books, which I could
bury myself in for weeks at a time, Jinx’s Magic was written an
hour here, a day there.
That
it got written at all amazes me when I look back.
Jinx’s Fire was fun, because I
got to tie off all the characters’ story
lines, and to deliver on some things I’d
been preparing since the first book. And it was satisfying discovering how Jinx
had grown into himself. Also, there are some jokes in there that made me laugh.
I laughed my head off over Jinx and the ogre. I may be the only one who did.
Is
there any chance that you will give us any more peeks at the Urwald? I know I am not
alone in thinking that a story about Simon and Sophie meeting for the first
time would be lovely...
Someday…. I would like to
write Simon and Sophie’s backstory. I did
put a little of it into Jinx’s Magic but it was too grim and had to be deleted. (I thought it
would be interesting to explain where Calvin (me--a skull that Simon just "happens" to have on hand) came from. But you know, no one’s ever asked?)
If
I did write their story, there’d be the difficulty
of point of view. Would Simon still be funny if seen from his own POV? Probably
not. So, would the story be better told from his POV or from Sophie’s?
Either
way, neither of them is going to be quite the same person they are when seen
through Jinx’s eyes. I’m just pondering
these things.
Diana
Wynne Jones handled this very well in The Lives of Christopher Chant.
Since we’re in Christopher’s POV in that book,
we never see, as we do in other novels and short stories that include this
character, that other people find him insufferable.
What
will your next book be about, and when can we expect to see it?
Miss
Ellicott’s School for the
Magically Minded (working
title). It’s about a girl and
her dragon, trapped within a patriarchal society which is in turn trapped
within itself. At present the plan is that it will be coming from Katherine
Tegen Books (HarperCollins) in early 2017. The manuscript is with the editor,
Katie Bignell, and I await her thoughts on it. (me--sounds right up my alley! I'll be looking forward to it).
Thanks
for coming up with these great questions, Charlotte. I had such a lot of fun
thinking about the answers. It’s a pleasure to be
interviewed by you.
Thank you, very much, Sage! And now of course I am awfully curious about Calvin's back-story...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete